Case Study

CEDAW and Muslim Family Laws: In Search of Common Ground

This report outlines the arguments related to Islam made by 44 OIC countries in their CEDAW reporting documents and constructive dialogues with the Committee, and Musawah’s responses based on our Framework for Action. This outlines the results of the research and Musawah’s responses to these results. It explains the findings from the research in terms …

CEDAW and Muslim Family Laws: In Search of Common Ground Read More »

Abusive supervision: A systematic review and fundamental rethink

Abusive supervision is conceptualized in a confused manner that conflates followers’ subjective evaluations of abuse with leaders’ behaviors. It is how conceptual confusion is reflected in and undermines dominant measurement tools. They identify and critique overreliance on cross-sectional survey-based studies and vignette experiments, which vary considerably in the extent to which they can evidence causal …

Abusive supervision: A systematic review and fundamental rethink Read More »

Capturing changes in women’s lives: the experiences of Oxfam Canada in applying feminist evaluation principles to monitoring and evaluation practice

This article describes Oxfam Canada’s efforts to develop a mixed-methods approach to monitoring, evaluation, and learning rooted in feminist evaluation principles, for Engendering Change, a multi-year, donor co-funded ‘standalone’ women’s rights programme. The article describes our understanding of feminist evaluation and what we believed it offered to strengthen our approach to monitoring and evaluation. Asset …

Capturing changes in women’s lives: the experiences of Oxfam Canada in applying feminist evaluation principles to monitoring and evaluation practice Read More »

Skip to content